i have a directed audio 15" subwoofer in a ported box. i am running a volfenhag 1240watt peak power amplifier to it. i have friends with crunch 1500 watt amps and 2 12" subs that hit way harder than mine. by doing some research it says that volfenhag 1240watt amp only pumps 200watt rms when bridged. so im believing that my amp is the problem. but i heard about getting a line driver and an equalizer plugged to it because i am running my system off of a factory deck. i was wondering if buying those 2 would increase it pretty noticeable. if not im guessing ima have to go with a better amp. personally i think that would b best but im cheap right now and if that eq and line driver makes a big improvement then ima go with that for right now. whats my best alternative for a stock radio
1st off your amplifier is a 4 channel that is 1240w peak split four ways roughly. 2nd when you bridge 2 channels your only getting power from the two channels not all four. 3rd after being split into 2 your peak power is 620w and your RMS is 310w, so your sub woofer is only getting 310w...plus your stock head unit won't put out enough power as you'd want it to...my recommendation get a new head unit with a bass output on the back and/or 2 channel and bridge it and/or get a Mono block amplifier... Enclosed Subwoofer Showdown::
Jul 13, 2004 The down side — a sealed box is relatively inefficient, so it takes more power to create a given amount of bass than with other designs.
http://www.crutchfield.com/ISEO-rgbtcspd/learn/reviews/20040713/subs_comparison.html?print=1&page=allHOME |
perlembed - how to embed perl in your C program::
sub expo { my ($a, $b) = @_; return $a ** $b; }. Now I'll create a C program, power.c, with a function PerlPower() that contains all the perlguts necessary
http://www.perl.com/doc/manual/html/pod/perlembed.htmlHOME |
 Red Hat's Rough Recovery From CFO Exit
 Windows Live Finds a New, Pre-installed Home |
